Jinzo

Why this card matters

Verified factKonami's database lists Jinzo as a DARK Level 6 Machine Effect Monster and places PSV-000 in Pharaoh's Servant as a Secret Rare with an English TCG date of 2002-10-20. The card has many later printings, but the original PSV-000 Secret Rare is the collector version this record covers. The PSA page used here is specifically for the 2002 Pharaoh's Servant 1st Edition Jinzo category, so its sales and population should not be applied to Unlimited or later copies. ^[1][2]

Identifying the exact version

Verified factConfirm the card name, PSV-000 number, English language, Secret Rare finish, and edition stamp. A 1st Edition copy should show the proper 1st Edition marker and should not be merged with Unlimited or Asian-English copies. Konami lists later Jinzo versions in tins, Dark Beginning, Retro Pack, Gold Series, Duelist Saga, and modern products, making a name-only comp especially dangerous. For graded copies, match the certification record, grade, label variety, and visible card against the seller's photos. ^[1][2]

What moves the price between versions and grades

AnalysisThe PSA CardFacts data show distinct recent 1st Edition PSA sales by grade, including PSA 10, PSA 9, PSA 8, and lower grades. Condition rarity drives much of the spread, but Chapter 04 warns that a raw copy must be inspected before assigning a likely grade. Chapter 03 also requires excluding later Jinzo printings, BPT tin copies, Unlimited PSV, Asian-English labels, and lots. A single strong PSA 10 sale should not be generalized to every Jinzo copy. ^[2]

Authenticity checks

AnalysisCompare the card to Konami's official Jinzo entry and a known authentic Secret Rare PSV example. Check set code, edition stamp, foil, text, back design, corners, edges, and surface. Use several checks together; do not use destructive tests. For slabs, verify the cert and compare label wording and holder to the photos, but remember that a valid cert number can be copied onto a fake insert or misused in a listing. Weak photos should be treated as insufficient evidence. ^[1][3]